Advani vs Modi: truth and the lies !!

Advani-ji, a name in the Indian political scenerio, which no one in poltics would dare to neglect, yet his own party, chose to defy him for the sake of a man with a magical charisma, yes NaMo is the name. Once regarded as the Iron-Man of modern India, this man who earned all his fame by himself, for his firmness on his views, whether political or personal, this man seems to shatter his own legacy/fame by enacting a political drama. Was this move justified ? Or it was just another episode in the Great-Indian-Stage of poltu !! Let me throw a little light on the issue.

The man, who dared to revolt against perhaps the most strict and dominating woman leader in Indian History (Indira Gandhi),  went behind the bars, and came out to become cabinet minister, now seems to lose his charisma and hold over a party, he himself established, for some-one now seems to overshadow him, the man, whom his followers chose to call, "development-master". Yes, NaMo deserves to be called that !! After all, he did so much development in a state where even the  then-chief-minister (Keshubhai Patel) himself resigned for being unable to manage it. It was  that perhaps the best PM of India, Atal Bihari Vajpayee brought NaMo to power, and till today, the charisma continues. But, the question is: Why is Advaniji fearing the rise of NaMo ??

Well, the reasons seem to vary, depending on the political mindset of the junta, and definitely the writer :P

But, here i try to produce all the facts, which i thought to be true:

1) Fearing the rising face of BJP:

Modi is known to out-perform then his mentors, mostly to the dislike of the later. Be it KeshuBhai Patel or LK Advani or his childhood buddy, Praveen togadia.

Congress: They don't provide views on such intellectual behaviours, they just give views which makes news for the lay man, without asking for much effort from the brains of the tired common man.

Anti-Modi Intellectuals: They regard him as a back-stabbers, they seem to have a strong dislike  for modi's this attitude. They seem to have a view-point that Modi uses other's shoulders to stand-Up and as he rises, leaves the shoulders with an ache, on which he once stood, without caring for them.

Modi-ites: They seem to have an altogether different argument for this. They seem to argue that when Modi was low, he needed some of the top level people to rise, to reach his dream of modern india, and for that he shaked hands of all he needed, and when he no longer needed to collaborate with those, because of un-matched ideology, he left them on their own. This "quality" of Modi, as per them, makes him an ideal-"politician", that they claim what India needs at present. 

2) Self-Interests:

It is well known that advani and vajpayee had been the pillars of BJP till 2004. They were the ones, whose combined effort made party rise so high. So, Advani had a dream of becoming the successor of throne after his colleague vajpayee-ji took retirement from politics. But, janta broke his dream by electing UPA to power in 2004 and then in 2009. Was this the end of Advani's desire for PM or he wanted more ? And to-desire is not at all a bad thing, was it wrong for advani to desire that, after all he has done all that for his party ?

Well, to change with time is needed for all, and to change with time is a necessity in politics. Advani seems to fail in that. Advani had been the face of BJP for long, but perhaps now, the winds seem to have turned paths. NaMo, with his rising popularity, has overpaced the 86 year old, Advani-ji. With NDA failing to be back in power in 2004, with the face of Vajpayee, and then in 2009, with the face of Advani, now seems to be searching for a new/fresh face, and NaMo seems a perfect choice for that. With full support from RSS and party-workers, the modi-charishma works well in BJP. But, seemingly advani seems unprepared for that. Advani-ji needs to understand that he is no longer some-one the party can unanimously rely upon, after losing 2 consecutive elections. Advaniji's backing by the RSS, suffered well back to the time, when advani-ji expressed his views on Jinnah, well against party and sangh. And all his close people, who seem to oppose NaMo, seem to be the guys, Advani always backed, be it sushma-swaraj, whom Advani-ji wanted to be party-president, when gadkari was elected or be it Uma-Bharti, whom Advani-ji welcomed back into the party. So, for me it seems to be in-legitimate on the part of Advani, to ask for a lesser role for Modi, and a bigger role for himself.

3) Modi fears:

Well, if we take an assumption that Advani-ji is a man, who wants to see a developed India. Then to him, modi is a man, well-known to be a pseudo-autocratic, listening to only those, whom he thinks to be correct. It is repeated in the news channels that Advani-ji demands from modi to discuss things before he implements in the election committee of BJP, clearly showing he fears the rise of a dictator in modi, overshadowing him.

Well, all of India, whether congressi or BJP-ian beliefs deep in the heart that modi has done development in Gujrat, a state that was shattered by two consecutive furies, one of nature and other by mankind. But, the question is did modi behave like a dictator ? Well, to an extent, i would say yes, and one needs to neglect some guys to encourage development, the extent is wat that matters ! All Modi supporters regard him as a oppurtunist rather than a dictator and this is where you need to draw your line dividing the two!

NOTE: If you find anything abusive/not correct, please report it to me, on my email-id: kumarsubham.grd@gmail.com