Saturday 15 June 2013

Kejriwal: The Name that strikes!

When I was a child, I wanted to be a bus driver. Isn't it exciting for a child who loves journeys, to be able to drive and travel in something as big a bus!
When I grew up a bit, I wanted to become an Engineer, after all, it is so much fascinating to build things, and implement my ideas so much creatively.
When I further grew up, I wanted to become an IAS officer, as I wanted to take electricity to the villages similar to my own and have power to change whatever I might feel wrong.
When I told this my father, he said me that real power lies with the politicians, without whose consent, an officer will not be able to do much. On asking on how to become that, I was answered that I cannot become a politician as it needs a lot of money or a family background.
I was then sad but now, I see a hope.

Yes, now I see a hope to bring/see a change in India,
Now I see hope in bringing back glory to India,
Now I see hope in Arvind Kejriwal.



This is what, perhaps everyone in India, who dreams or ever dreamt of, to bring a change to India via political changes, thinks of Kejriwal. The way Kejriwal operates in politics, has given me a hope to see that things can change, if you dare to bring it. Anna feared that politics cannot run without money power, and my dad said, that Anna understands India, and Kejriwal is impractical. But today, when I see Kejriwal, I see hope. I am now optimistic that the dream of Swami Vivekananda and Dr APJ Abdul Kalam will soon be achieved. India will once again be a world leader, without compromising with its principles and values. Arvind has in its mind, the basic ideology of democracy that is: "By the people, from the people, and for the people" and is leading a party formed by the common masses of India, who get themselves financed from the Common-man, and wish to give a government working for the people, and that’s what I seem to find the only “democratic” political party in the world’s biggest democracy.

I once heard a phrase: "Politics is too serious a field, to be left only for politicians", and I found it too apt for Indian scenario. This IIT-Grad engineer has redefined the rules; he plays a clean game in a dirty land. Whatever may be the election results; at least this guy is successful in infusing confidence and optimism in Delhites. I never found the commoners of Delhi more optimistic, than I see now, they now think that the national capital doesn't only deserves high prices for the basic necessities, but better services as well. They deserve cleaner roads, more security, and more involvement of the common man in governance and definitely lesser scams. "Kejriwala", as his loved ones call him, is the name of a man, who envisions bringing back the idea of Swaraj to India. He is not just helping them to visualize a better Delhi, but assisting them in taking an informed decision for their future. Now, for me and thousands like me, it doesn't matter much that whether AAP (Aam Aadmi Party) wins or loses, as at least we all now know that we need not belong to a political family, or be from a rich family with large black-money to spend on elections. I just need to work for my mother India, and I would be able to achieve the India of my dreams with me being able to contribute to it.

People say to me, Kejriwal is greedy for power, that’s why he entered politics. I say to them, if contesting election shows the greedy nature, let Congress/BJP/SP/BSP etc. show that they are not greedy for power by not contesting an election. Show that you guys just want to serve the society by doing what Arvind had done while working for Parivartan.

Let me give some insight to how he is different:

1) Superb Combination of a patient listener, good orator, and a fierce warrior:

Have you ever listened to his interviews with the media houses? If not, do give a look, and you would be feel the heat, the burning desire to change India in him, and a rising spark in you as well when you listen to him. An awesome orator with a great mind, a combination witty enough, to make the listener his fan.


2) Issue-based politics:

Yes I know that for this reason many dislike him for one doesn't need issue-based politics in the long run. But, I like him for that. I like him that he doesn't just wish to create chaos (as many feel), but to create awareness among the “Aam Aadmi”. He wishes to help the people make an informed decision.  He is the type of opposition, one of greatest leaders, Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee dreamt of!

In his "Bizli-pani andolan", he not only showed the high rates, but also made the people aware that, they have the rights to question the government regarding that. The people dared to defy the government, and after a long time regained their long-lost faith on democracy. More than 10 lakh letters submitted during the time, show how prevalent this previously latent issue was.


3) Vision:

Kejriwal is one of the very few politicians in Modern India, who has/shares his views on nearly every matter that concerns India, and the people. He is neither leftist nor rightist, neither completely believes in socialistic economy nor in capitalistic economy, but believes to have an optimum mix of the two. He believes to take good things out of every ideology, and maximize the productivity of the nation.

Many of many friends, who support BJP, say to me that BJP is run by a vision; they have a guiding force, which AAP lacks in! I seriously feel how is BJP an idealistic party, with the senior leaders accused of serious corruption charges? How do they claim to follow one principle, when one of its ruled states (Madhya Pradesh) becomes the first of India's state to implement RTI, while the other (Gujarat) fails to implement it properly/effectively? How is BJP a party, who wish to work for "shining India", when the top leaders are in a cat-fight mode for power? What sort of ideology governs them, when they do not even submit their revenue sources to the election commission? How Modi claims to support industries when their party opposes the government for favouring the retail-chains claiming them to hamper the small shop owners? I am just raising these questions, because I seriously don't find a single use of principles, if someone can't abide to them. It is like the old parrot singing "thief will come, put in seeds, do not get caught", but eventually gets caught. That is what I visualize today's BJP as.

And for Congress, I don't think I need to say anything, as this is a party, with no ideology, no vision, just determined to bring back monarchical system back, with all its leaders (Yes, I too just noticed, ALL!!) been accused of charges of corruption and mismanagement. One of my friends, presently working in a media house, recently, while we were discussing something in politics, claimed that today, even if some educated person supports congress, will not dare to declare it public, that is the congress carries to the educated.



4) Ground Level Experience:

Many say that Arvind does not have the ground-level experience, I smile and say them to read about him, read how this man worked so hard to get RTI implemented in Delhi, how this man fought for the rights of people while working for parivartan, how this guy dared to be in fast, for so long, just to persuade the government to pass a law, that would make them more accountable to the people who believed in them.


4) Tactics:

He is changing the ways, politics used to operate.
He dares to question the queen!
He dares to raise fingers at the industrial giants!
He is redefining Indian politics by playing it fair!
He is making the "Aam Aadmi" feel important!

When AK decided to contest against Sheila Dikshit, he showed that politics is not just to get power; it is to question the wrong! If it would have been just for power, other seats could have been the best suited for him. But he is now questioning the Delhi-Queen to see the power of the common man, she had been neglecting for long.


5) Money:

Anna Hazare decided not to enter politics, for he seemed to have view, that politics remains limited to the powerful. He believed that on cannot play fair over here, and his "chela" (mentee) is now showing how to do the seemingly impossible, possible. Fully transparent donation process makes a donor feel important part of "Change 4 India"!


6) Strong Constitution:

He is playing the same old game of politics against the old giants, with a different set of rules. Rules curbing nepotism, rules curbing politics for money/power, rules curbing money making in politics. They have a very strong, well-built constitution in place, which attracts the elite, the lawyers, the engineers and the IAS officers to take an active participation in elections.


So, when I hope in AK, all my fellows seem to agree with me. What they don't agree with, is the hope in Indian voters, who is very forgetful and forgives easily. So, whenever you hear about an election coming soon, do take a decision, an informed decision, not the decision imposed on you by the government or by the surroundings, but a decision, which you chose to take by understanding things!!

Wednesday 12 June 2013

Advani vs Modi: truth and the lies !!



Advani-ji, a name in the Indian political scenerio, which no one in poltics would dare to neglect, yet his own party, chose to defy him for the sake of a man with a magical charisma, yes NaMo is the name. Once regarded as the Iron-Man of modern India, this man who earned all his fame by himself, for his firmness on his views, whether political or personal, this man seems to shatter his own legacy/fame by enacting a political drama. Was this move justified ? Or it was just another episode in the Great-Indian-Stage of poltu !! Let me throw a little light on the issue.



The man, who dared to revolt against perhaps the most strict and dominating woman leader in Indian History (Indira Gandhi),  went behind the bars, and came out to become cabinet minister, now seems to lose his charisma and hold over a party, he himself established, for some-one now seems to overshadow him, the man, whom his followers chose to call, "development-master". Yes, NaMo deserves to be called that !! After all, he did so much development in a state where even the  then-chief-minister (Keshubhai Patel) himself resigned for being unable to manage it. It was  that perhaps the best PM of India, Atal Bihari Vajpayee brought NaMo to power, and till today, the charisma continues. But, the question is: Why is Advaniji fearing the rise of NaMo ??

Well, the reasons seem to vary, depending on the political mindset of the junta, and definitely the writer :P

But, here i try to produce all the facts, which i thought to be true:

1) Fearing the rising face of BJP:

Modi is known to out-perform then his mentors, mostly to the dislike of the later. Be it KeshuBhai Patel or LK Advani or his childhood buddy, Praveen togadia.

Congress: They don't provide views on such intellectual behaviours, they just give views which makes news for the lay man, without asking for much effort from the brains of the tired common man.

Anti-Modi Intellectuals: They regard him as a back-stabbers, they seem to have a strong dislike  for modi's this attitude. They seem to have a view-point that Modi uses other's shoulders to stand-Up and as he rises, leaves the shoulders with an ache, on which he once stood, without caring for them.

Modi-ites: They seem to have an altogether different argument for this. They seem to argue that when Modi was low, he needed some of the top level people to rise, to reach his dream of modern india, and for that he shaked hands of all he needed, and when he no longer needed to collaborate with those, because of un-matched ideology, he left them on their own. This "quality" of Modi, as per them, makes him an ideal-"politician", that they claim what India needs at present. 

2) Self-Interests:

It is well known that advani and vajpayee had been the pillars of BJP till 2004. They were the ones, whose combined effort made party rise so high. So, Advani had a dream of becoming the successor of throne after his colleague vajpayee-ji took retirement from politics. But, janta broke his dream by electing UPA to power in 2004 and then in 2009. Was this the end of Advani's desire for PM or he wanted more ? And to-desire is not at all a bad thing, was it wrong for advani to desire that, after all he has done all that for his party ?

Well, to change with time is needed for all, and to change with time is a necessity in politics. Advani seems to fail in that. Advani had been the face of BJP for long, but perhaps now, the winds seem to have turned paths. NaMo, with his rising popularity, has overpaced the 86 year old, Advani-ji. With NDA failing to be back in power in 2004, with the face of Vajpayee, and then in 2009, with the face of Advani, now seems to be searching for a new/fresh face, and NaMo seems a perfect choice for that. With full support from RSS and party-workers, the modi-charishma works well in BJP. But, seemingly advani seems unprepared for that. Advani-ji needs to understand that he is no longer some-one the party can unanimously rely upon, after losing 2 consecutive elections. Advaniji's backing by the RSS, suffered well back to the time, when advani-ji expressed his views on Jinnah, well against party and sangh. And all his close people, who seem to oppose NaMo, seem to be the guys, Advani always backed, be it sushma-swaraj, whom Advani-ji wanted to be party-president, when gadkari was elected or be it Uma-Bharti, whom Advani-ji welcomed back into the party. So, for me it seems to be in-legitimate on the part of Advani, to ask for a lesser role for Modi, and a bigger role for himself.

3) Modi fears:

Well, if we take an assumption that Advani-ji is a man, who wants to see a developed India. Then to him, modi is a man, well-known to be a pseudo-autocratic, listening to only those, whom he thinks to be correct. It is repeated in the news channels that Advani-ji demands from modi to discuss things before he implements in the election committee of BJP, clearly showing he fears the rise of a dictator in modi, overshadowing him.

Well, all of India, whether congressi or BJP-ian beliefs deep in the heart that modi has done development in Gujrat, a state that was shattered by two consecutive furies, one of nature and other by mankind. But, the question is did modi behave like a dictator ? Well, to an extent, i would say yes, and one needs to neglect some guys to encourage development, the extent is wat that matters ! All Modi supporters regard him as a oppurtunist rather than a dictator and this is where you need to draw your line dividing the two!


NOTE: If you find anything abusive/not correct, please report it to me, on my email-id: kumarsubham.grd@gmail.com